OK, Notwithstanding government hiring lets examine this shall we...
Source; Wikipedia ,,,, ( *I know, keep reading )
Now even taking that as a measure one can clearly see the bimbo in the video is incorrect.
The source for those charts in the Wikipedia entry clarifies the criteria by which they were drawn-up.
Now even taking that as a measure one can clearly see the bimbo in the video is incorrect.
The source for those charts in the Wikipedia entry clarifies the criteria by which they were drawn-up.
Anyone capable of performing very simple math can see the Bush 43 years (8) to that of Obamas' 2009 to present, June as being the last month data available, Bush receives credit for 1.08 million job's in JOB CREATION on his watch while Obama gets credited for 3.1 million JOB'S LOST.
I am not pretending Bush had a great record in this area but at the same time recognise the fact of the 9-11 attacks shortly after he was elected that served to stifle the economy immediately, as well as the liberal housing bubble burst did the very same at the end of his second term.
Now there are other, more *reputable sources out there to dispute this crazy union claim in the video, but I chose to present Wikipedia being it is the liberals favorite site to reference and even they dispute her claim. This is something that the union mouthpiece should have also known before sticking her foot in her mouth.
Now there are other, more *reputable sources out there to dispute this crazy union claim in the video, but I chose to present Wikipedia being it is the liberals favorite site to reference and even they dispute her claim. This is something that the union mouthpiece should have also known before sticking her foot in her mouth.
